Representación de género y dimensión simbólica: nuevas propuestas teórico-metodológicas para el análisis de políticas públicas
Resumen
El presente artículo tiene como principal objetivo caracterizar algunas propuestas teórico-metodológicas recientes que comparten el interés por realizar un análisis discursivo crítico de medidas ligadas a asuntos de género. Sostendremos que dichas perspectivas brindan herramientas que posibilitan el relevamiento de las representaciones simbólicas de género implícitas en las medidas y que configuran sus criterios de elegibilidad y reconocimiento.
Citas
ARCHENTI, NÉLIDA, (2014). “El proceso hacia la paridad en América Latina. Argentina y Costa Rica, experiencias comparadas”, Revista Derecho Electoral, N. º 17, Enero-Junio, pp. 304-332.
BACCHI, CAROL, (2000). “The Seesaw Effect: Down Goes Affirmative Action, Up Comes Workplace Diversity”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies 5 (2), Special Issue: Gender and Workplace Relations, pp. 64-83.
BACCHI, CAROL, (2001). “Gender Mainstreaming: A New Vision, More of the Same, or Backlash?”, Dialogue: Academy of the Social Sciences, 20, pp. 16-20.
BACCHI, CAROL, (2010). “Policy and discourse: challenging the construction of affirmative action as preferential treatment”, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:1, pp. 128-146.
BACCHI, CAROL AND EVELINE, JOAN, (2003). “Mainstreaming and Neoliberalism: A Contested Relationship”, Policy & Society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 98-118.
BALDEZ, LISA, (2011). “The UN Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): A New Way to Measure Women’s Interests”, Politics & Gender 7 (3), pp. 419–423.
BEDIN, PAULA, (2019). Aportes teórico-metodológicos para un estudio complejo de la representación política de las mujeres. Estudios sociales, Vol. 57 Núm. 2, Ediciones UNL y Programa Bibliotecas, Santa Fé.
BLACK, DONALD (1989). Sociological Justice, New York, Oxford University Press.
BUTLER, JUDITH, (1990). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the subversion of Identity, New York, Routlegde.
BUTLER, JUDITH, (1993). Bodies that matter, on the discursive limits of "sex", London, New York, Routledge. Traducción utilizada: Butler, Judith (2012) Cuerpos que importan. Sobre los límites materiales y discursivos del “sexo”, Buenos Aires, Paidós.
BUTLER, JUDITH, (1996). “An affirmative view”, Representations, No. 55, Special Issue: Race and Representation: Affirmative Action. (Summer, 1996), pp. 74-83.
CELIS, KAREN ET AL, (2014). “Constituting Women’s Interests through Representative Claims”, Politics & Gender, 10, pp. 149–174.
CELIS, KAREN AND CHILDS, SARAH, (2012). “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservatives’ Claims?”, Political Studies 60 (1), pp. 213–225.
CELIS, KAREN AND ERZEEL SILVIA, (2015). “Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non- Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women”, Government and Opposition, 50, pp. 45-64.
DAHLERUP, DRUDE, (1988). “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics”, Scandinacian Political Studies, Vol II-No. 4.
DAHLERUP, DRUDE, (2006). “The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass”, Politics & Gender, 2, Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics, pp. 511-522.
GUERRINA, ROBERTA, (2003). “Gender, Mainstreaming and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights”, Policy, Organization and Society 22 (1), pp. 97-115.
MACKAY, FIONA, (2008). “‘Thick’ Conceptions of substantive representation: women, gender and political institutions”, Representation, 44:2, pp. 125-139.
MACKAY, FIONA, AND BILTON, KATE, (2000). Learning From Experience: Lessons in Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities. University of Edinburgh: Governance of Scotland Forum.
MOSER, CAROLINE AND MOSER, ANNALISE, (2005). “Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A review of success and limitations in international institutions”, Gender & Development, 13:2, pp. 11-22.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA, (2003). “Entrada: Mainstreaming de Género/Transversalidad” en: Diccionario de Mujeres y Ámbito Local, Disponible en: http://www.ief.es/documentos/investigacion/genero/impacto_genero/2007_IG_Diccionario_Lombardo.pdf, 2/2/2016.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA AND MEIER, PETRA, (2014). The Symbolic Representation of Gender: a discursive approach, Surrey and Burlington: Ashgate.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA AND MEIER, PETRA, (2017). Capturing in words what a symbol symbolizes? Challenges for studying symbolic representation from a discursive approach, Politics, Groups, and Identities.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA AND MEIER, PETRA, (2018). “Good Symbolic Representation: The Relevance of Inclusion”, American Political Science Association, April.
PITKIN, HANNA FENICHEL, (1967). The concept of representation, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press.
RADIN, JANE MARGARET, (1991). Affirmative Action Rhetoric, Social Philosophy & Policy Vol. 8 Issue 2, pp. 130-149.
REES, TERESA, (2005). “Reflections on the uneven development of gender mainstreaming in Europe”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7:4, pp. 555-574.
ROUNAQ, JAHAN, (1995). “The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development”, The Pakistan Development Review, 35: 4, Winter, pp. 825-834.
SAWARD, MICHAEL, (2010). The representative claim, New York, Oxford University Press.
SAWARD, MICHAEL, (2012). Claims and constructions, Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 11, 1, pp. 123-127.
SQUIRES, JUDITH, (2005). Is Mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, Volume 12, Number 3, pp. 366-388.
SQUIRES, JUDITH, (2007). The New Politics of Gender Equality, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
SQUIRES, JUDITH, (2008). The constitutive representation of gender: extra‐parliamentary re‐presentations of gender relations, Representation, 44:2, pp. 187-204.
TEGHTSOONIAN, KATHERINE, (2003). W(h)ither Women’s Equality? Neoliberalism, Institutional Change and Public Policy in British Columbia, Policy, Organization and Society 22 (1), pp. 26-47.
TEIGEN, MARI, (2010). The affirmative action controversy, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 8:2, pp. 63-77.
TRUE, JAQUI AND MINTROM MICHEL, (2001). Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming, International Studies Quarterly 45, pp. 27-57.
VERLOO, MIEKE, (2005). Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. A Critical Frame Analysis Approach, The Greek Review of Social Research, 117, pp. 11-34
WALBY, SYLVIA, (2005). Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 12, issue 3, pp. 321-343.
WELDON, LAUREN, (2002). Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 4 November, pp. 1153-1174.
WOODWARD, ALISON, (2001). Gender Mainstreaming in European Policy: Innovation or Deception?, Discussion Paper FS 101-103. Wissenschafftszentrum Berlin Fur Sozialforschung.
BACCHI, CAROL, (2000). “The Seesaw Effect: Down Goes Affirmative Action, Up Comes Workplace Diversity”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies 5 (2), Special Issue: Gender and Workplace Relations, pp. 64-83.
BACCHI, CAROL, (2001). “Gender Mainstreaming: A New Vision, More of the Same, or Backlash?”, Dialogue: Academy of the Social Sciences, 20, pp. 16-20.
BACCHI, CAROL, (2010). “Policy and discourse: challenging the construction of affirmative action as preferential treatment”, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:1, pp. 128-146.
BACCHI, CAROL AND EVELINE, JOAN, (2003). “Mainstreaming and Neoliberalism: A Contested Relationship”, Policy & Society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 98-118.
BALDEZ, LISA, (2011). “The UN Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): A New Way to Measure Women’s Interests”, Politics & Gender 7 (3), pp. 419–423.
BEDIN, PAULA, (2019). Aportes teórico-metodológicos para un estudio complejo de la representación política de las mujeres. Estudios sociales, Vol. 57 Núm. 2, Ediciones UNL y Programa Bibliotecas, Santa Fé.
BLACK, DONALD (1989). Sociological Justice, New York, Oxford University Press.
BUTLER, JUDITH, (1990). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the subversion of Identity, New York, Routlegde.
BUTLER, JUDITH, (1993). Bodies that matter, on the discursive limits of "sex", London, New York, Routledge. Traducción utilizada: Butler, Judith (2012) Cuerpos que importan. Sobre los límites materiales y discursivos del “sexo”, Buenos Aires, Paidós.
BUTLER, JUDITH, (1996). “An affirmative view”, Representations, No. 55, Special Issue: Race and Representation: Affirmative Action. (Summer, 1996), pp. 74-83.
CELIS, KAREN ET AL, (2014). “Constituting Women’s Interests through Representative Claims”, Politics & Gender, 10, pp. 149–174.
CELIS, KAREN AND CHILDS, SARAH, (2012). “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservatives’ Claims?”, Political Studies 60 (1), pp. 213–225.
CELIS, KAREN AND ERZEEL SILVIA, (2015). “Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non- Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women”, Government and Opposition, 50, pp. 45-64.
DAHLERUP, DRUDE, (1988). “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics”, Scandinacian Political Studies, Vol II-No. 4.
DAHLERUP, DRUDE, (2006). “The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass”, Politics & Gender, 2, Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics, pp. 511-522.
GUERRINA, ROBERTA, (2003). “Gender, Mainstreaming and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights”, Policy, Organization and Society 22 (1), pp. 97-115.
MACKAY, FIONA, (2008). “‘Thick’ Conceptions of substantive representation: women, gender and political institutions”, Representation, 44:2, pp. 125-139.
MACKAY, FIONA, AND BILTON, KATE, (2000). Learning From Experience: Lessons in Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities. University of Edinburgh: Governance of Scotland Forum.
MOSER, CAROLINE AND MOSER, ANNALISE, (2005). “Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A review of success and limitations in international institutions”, Gender & Development, 13:2, pp. 11-22.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA, (2003). “Entrada: Mainstreaming de Género/Transversalidad” en: Diccionario de Mujeres y Ámbito Local, Disponible en: http://www.ief.es/documentos/investigacion/genero/impacto_genero/2007_IG_Diccionario_Lombardo.pdf, 2/2/2016.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA AND MEIER, PETRA, (2014). The Symbolic Representation of Gender: a discursive approach, Surrey and Burlington: Ashgate.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA AND MEIER, PETRA, (2017). Capturing in words what a symbol symbolizes? Challenges for studying symbolic representation from a discursive approach, Politics, Groups, and Identities.
LOMBARDO, EMANUELA AND MEIER, PETRA, (2018). “Good Symbolic Representation: The Relevance of Inclusion”, American Political Science Association, April.
PITKIN, HANNA FENICHEL, (1967). The concept of representation, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press.
RADIN, JANE MARGARET, (1991). Affirmative Action Rhetoric, Social Philosophy & Policy Vol. 8 Issue 2, pp. 130-149.
REES, TERESA, (2005). “Reflections on the uneven development of gender mainstreaming in Europe”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7:4, pp. 555-574.
ROUNAQ, JAHAN, (1995). “The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development”, The Pakistan Development Review, 35: 4, Winter, pp. 825-834.
SAWARD, MICHAEL, (2010). The representative claim, New York, Oxford University Press.
SAWARD, MICHAEL, (2012). Claims and constructions, Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 11, 1, pp. 123-127.
SQUIRES, JUDITH, (2005). Is Mainstreaming transformative? Theorizing Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, Volume 12, Number 3, pp. 366-388.
SQUIRES, JUDITH, (2007). The New Politics of Gender Equality, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
SQUIRES, JUDITH, (2008). The constitutive representation of gender: extra‐parliamentary re‐presentations of gender relations, Representation, 44:2, pp. 187-204.
TEGHTSOONIAN, KATHERINE, (2003). W(h)ither Women’s Equality? Neoliberalism, Institutional Change and Public Policy in British Columbia, Policy, Organization and Society 22 (1), pp. 26-47.
TEIGEN, MARI, (2010). The affirmative action controversy, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 8:2, pp. 63-77.
TRUE, JAQUI AND MINTROM MICHEL, (2001). Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming, International Studies Quarterly 45, pp. 27-57.
VERLOO, MIEKE, (2005). Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. A Critical Frame Analysis Approach, The Greek Review of Social Research, 117, pp. 11-34
WALBY, SYLVIA, (2005). Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 12, issue 3, pp. 321-343.
WELDON, LAUREN, (2002). Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 4 November, pp. 1153-1174.
WOODWARD, ALISON, (2001). Gender Mainstreaming in European Policy: Innovation or Deception?, Discussion Paper FS 101-103. Wissenschafftszentrum Berlin Fur Sozialforschung.
Descargas
Publicado
2020-07-15
Número
Sección
Dossier Desigualdades sociales, Estado y políticas públicas.
